Bolt Technology OU: Defending Cross-Border Trademark and Reputation

Name: Bolt Technology OU: Defending Cross-Border Trademark and Reputation (English version)
SKU: W46983

Dalaisha Aggarwal, Rashmi Kumar Aggarwal, Harvinder Singh

Product #:W46983

Supplier:Ivey

Discipline:International Business, Strategy

Setting:India, 2023

Details:Case (PDF) • 12 pages • 2026-03-17

Industries:

Transportation and distribution

Your Price:

$10.54

Purchase this material with a free Educator Account and enjoy more benefits:

Free Educator Copy
Free Teaching Notes
Build your coursepack
Discounted academic price

On February 24, 2023, the High Court of Delhi, India ruled against granting an injunction on Ujoy Technology Private Limited to stop using of the term “Bolt” as its trademark. The request was launched by Bolt Technology OU, an Estonian company that offered electric ride-sharing services. Bolt argued that its extensive presence in the global market helped the “Bolt” trademark gain a significant and substantial reputation that extended to India through advertising and promotion. It also claimed that the local company had misled customers by using the trademark of a well-known international business. However, the court rejected the claims and ruled against the injunction. This ruling was a departure from previous similar cross-border reputation trademark disputes in India, where the courts had protected foreign brands even with limited or no presence in the local market. The ruling also raised some questions for Bolt Technology OU, including whether to challenge the verdict or pursue amicable options to secure its brand in India.

Learning Objectives

This case is well suited to an introductory graduate course on the legal environment or legal aspects of business. It can also support an introductory business environment course by showing how regulation shapes strategy and operations. In a marketing specialization—particularly branding or brand management—the case illustrates how brand-building must align with local legal and regulatory requirements. Students should have a basic understanding of electric vehicles and the related ecosystem, including battery charging and replacement models.

The case examines a lawsuit brought by Bolt against Ujoy involving a brand’s cross-border reputation (CBR), treating reputation as a strategic business asset. Students engage with intellectual property protection—especially trademarks (and related branding, advertising, and promotional activities)—and how these legal rights affect brand strategy. After working through the case and assignment questions, students will be able to do the following:

Distinguish between goodwill and reputation of a trademark.
Understand the doctrine of CBR in the case of well-known trademarks.
Discuss the impact of geopolitical conditions and business-environment factors on determining whether a trademark is considered “well-known.”
Understand the role of cross-border marketing and promotion in establishing and protecting a brand.
Discuss branding implications for companies that operate globally.