Stripe Inc.: Private for Longer

Felipe Restrepo, Tarik Irshad

Product #:W53096

Supplier:Ivey

Discipline:Finance, Strategy

Setting:Ireland, United States, 2025

Details:Case (PDF) • 10 pages • 2026-11-10

Your Price:

$10.54

Purchase this material with a free Educator Account and enjoy more benefits:

Free Educator Copy
Free Teaching Notes
Build your coursepack
Discounted academic price

The case examines whether a highly successful late-stage private company still needs the public markets. By December 2024, Stripe Inc. had become one of the world’s most valuable private technology companies. It was profitable, processed US$1.4 trillion in annual payment volume, and had repeatedly demonstrated that it could raise capital and provide liquidity to employees and shareholders without an initial public offering (IPO). In particular, its 2023 financing and September 2025 tender offer illustrated how increasingly deep private and secondary markets could address liquidity needs that historically might have pushed a company toward an IPO. The case is set against a changing capital-market environment. Interest rates were declining, US IPO activity was recovering, and Elon Musk appeared to confirm plans for a 2026 Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) IPO at a potential valuation of $1.5 trillion. Together, these developments renewed a strategic question for Stripe: Had private-market liquidity made an IPO genuinely optional, or had it merely allowed the company to postpone a transition that could become increasingly valuable as it grew? Students must evaluate the benefits and limitations of public and private markets, distinguish between a company’s need for financing and its stakeholders’ need for liquidity, assess the role of market timing, and recommend whether Stripe should remain private or begin preparing for a public listing.

Learning Objectives

This case is suitable for advanced undergraduate, MSc, MBA, and executive-level courses in corporate finance, entrepreneurial finance, or capital markets. It works particularly well after students have been introduced to sources of corporate financing and the basic mechanics of equity issuance. Students do not require detailed knowledge of IPO valuation or underwriting, although familiarity with IPO underpricing, market liquidity, and private equity or venture capital is helpful.

The case can be used to introduce the changing boundary between public and private capital markets or as a capstone discussion on financing strategy. Its primary emphasis is not on calculating an optimal IPO price but on understanding why a company might choose to remain privately held or access the public equity markets.

After working through the case and assignment questions, students will be able to do the following:

Distinguish between a company’s need to raise capital and the liquidity needs of existing shareholders and employees and explain how these different objectives affect the decision to go public.
Evaluate the benefits and costs of public versus private ownership, including liquidity, access to capital, acquisition currency, disclosure, governance, managerial flexibility, and investor access.
Explain how the growth of secondary markets and tender offers has changed the traditional IPO calculus for mature private companies.
Assess how capital-market conditions and market timing affect an IPO decision, while recognizing that favourable market conditions alone do not determine whether a company should go public.
Develop and defend a recommendation under uncertainty by weighing company-specific considerations against external capital-market conditions.

Stripe Inc.: Private for Longer

Subjects:

Industries:

Geography:

Learning Objectives