<iframe src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-PHTV9K7" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">
Loading
Skip to Main Content
Product cover image for Tesla's Non-GAAP Accounting Measurements: Revenue Recognition and Stock-Based Compensation

Tesla's Non-GAAP Accounting Measurements: Revenue Recognition and Stock-Based Compensation

Martin Persson; Mitchell Stein; Spencer Higgs

Product #:9B17B019_P
Supplier:Ivey
Discipline:Accounting
Setting:United States, 2014
Details:Case (PDF) • 10 pages • 2017-08-24

Subjects:

Finance and investingAccounting

Industries:

Fabrication and manufacturing

Geography:

United StatesNorth America
Your Price:$9.71

Purchase this material with a free Educator Account and enjoy more benefits:

  • Free Educator Copy
  • Free Teaching Notes
  • Build your coursepack
  • Discounted academic price

In November 2014, questions were raised about American electric car manufacturer Tesla Motors Inc.'s (Tesla's) accounting practices, which did not follow the generally accepted accounting practices (GAAP). Tesla’s third quarter 2014 financial statements showed a loss of almost US$75 million when using U.S. GAAP standards, compared to a profit of over $5 million when using its own non-GAAP standards. The accounting discrepancy between the two systems was due mainly to the allotment of vehicle buybacks, stock-based compensation, and regulatory credit sales. Tesla’s share price had risen to $242 from its initial public offering of $17. Had the company’s non-GAAP adjustments influenced investors’ perception of Tesla’s performance and, therefore, the resulting stock price? Specifically, was it reasonable to state that Tesla had been profitable in the third quarter of 2014? Were Tesla’s non-GAAP adjustments appropriate? How could the adjustments between Tesla’s GAAP and non-GAAP numbers be explained? What would Tesla’s performance look like if the financial statements were adjusted for the resale value guarantee, regulatory credits, and stock-based compensation?

Learning Objectives

This case is suitable for an undergraduate financial accounting or graduate accounting course. Ideally, students should have some familiarity with public financial statements and some understanding of the principles underpinning revenue and expense recognition. After completion of the case, students will be able to
  • assess GAAP versus non-GAAP reporting, while demonstrating the substantial differences that can exist between the two methods;
  • adjust between GAAP and non-GAAP financials, while identifying the drivers of the differences between the two methods;
  • discuss different revenue recognition concepts; in particular, the treatment of revenue with a corresponding future commitment to customers, under the U.S. GAAP method;
  • distinguish between revenue from core business activities and revenue from non-core business activities; and
  • consider the relationship between public policy and company earnings.
    Loading
    Case Study: Tesla's Non-GAAP Accounting Measurements: Revenue Recognition and Stock-Based Compensation | Ivey Publishing